Numerical Impact of Tool Geometry on Hip Prosthesis Forming

Authors

  • Mondher NASRI LMPE-ENSIT

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37255/jme.v20i3pp122-135

Abstract

This paper examines the effect of incremental forming parameters on the process of a 304L stainless-steel biomedical part, which is inserted between the prosthesis and the cup to minimize wear and extend the lifespan of the prosthesis. The methodology involves several steps. First, the tool trajectory is determined. Then, modeling and numerical simulation are performed to select the optimal configuration, evaluate the final product geometry and forming tool force in relation to the forming angle, define the forming tool dimensions, and determine the axial step. Finally, the evaluation of the spring-back is conducted, along with an analysis of the parameters that influence the thinning of the component. The results highlight the relationship between punch diameter and axial displacement on the geometric quality of the deformed component. Furthermore, the force exerted varies as a function of axial steps, forming tool geometry, and the dimensions of the deformed component. Additionally, the number of contact points and the forming angle have an impact on the thinning. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Mondher NASRI, LMPE-ENSIT

    University of Tunis, LMPE, ENSIT

References

1. P. Triclot and F. Gouin, “Mise au point-«La grosse tête»: est-ce la solution au problème de la luxation de la prothèse de hanche?,” Revue de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. S120–S127, 2011.

2. H. Bergvinsson, M. Sundberg, and G. Flivik, “Polyethylene wear with ceramic and metal femoral heads at 5 years: a randomized controlled trial with radiostereometric analysis,” The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 3769–3776, 2020.

3. M. Ali, M. Al-Hajjar, J. Fisher, and L. M. Jennings, “Wear and deformation of metal-on-polyethylene hip bearings under edge loading conditions due to variations in component positioning,” Biotribology, vol. 33, p. 100238, 2023.

4. K. Bensaid, R. Souissi, A. Boulila, M. Ayadi, and N. Ben Fredj, “Numerical investigation of incremental forming process of AISI 304 stainless steel,” Ironmaking & Steelmaking, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 174–183, 2023.

5. Y. Li, Z. Liu, W. Daniel, and P. Meehan, “Simulation and experimental observations of effect of different contact interfaces on the incremental sheet forming process,” Materials and Manufacturing Processes, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 121–128, 2014.

6. B. Saidi, L. Giraud-Moreau, A. Cherouat, and R. Nasri, “Experimental and numerical study on optimization of the single point incremental forming of AINSI 304L stainless steel sheet,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing, 2017, p. 012039.

7. T. Cao et al., “An efficient method for thickness prediction in multi-pass incremental sheet forming,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 77, pp. 469–483, 2015.

8. J. Jeswiet et al., “Asymmetric single point incremental forming of sheet metal,” CIRP Annals, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 88–114, 2005.

9. B. Saidi, A. Boulila, M. Ayadi, and R. Nasri, “Experimental force measurements in single point incremental sheet forming SPIF,” Mechanics & Industry, vol. 16, no. 4, p. 410, 2015.

10. J. Duflou, Y. Tunckol, A. Szekeres, and P. Vanherck, “Experimental study on force measurements for single point incremental forming,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 189, nos. 1–3, pp. 65–72, 2007.

11. C. Reddy, “Experimental and numerical studies on formability of stainless steel 304 in incremental sheet metal forming of elliptical cups,” International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 971–976, 2017.

12. R. Alavala, “FEM analysis of single point incremental forming process and validation with grid-based experimental deformation analysis,” International Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 1–6, 2016.

13. R. Alavala, “Validation of single point incremental forming process for deep drawn pyramidal cups using experimental grid-based deformation,” International Journal of Engineering Sciences & Research Technology.

14. Y. Kim and J. Park, “Effect of process parameters on formability in incremental forming of sheet metal,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 130, pp. 42–46, 2002.

15. J. Jeswiet and D. Young, “Forming limit diagrams for single-point incremental forming of aluminium sheet,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, vol. 219, no. 4, pp. 359–364, 2005.

16. G. Ambrogio et al., “Application of incremental forming process for high customised medical product manufacturing,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 162, pp. 156–162, 2005.

17. S. Chezhian Babu and V. S. Senthil Kumar, “Experimental studies on incremental forming of stainless steel AISI 304 sheets,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, vol. 226, no. 7, pp. 1224–1229, 2012.

18. G. Ambrogio, J. Duflou, L. Filice, and R. Aerens, “Some considerations on force trends in incremental forming of different materials,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, American Institute of Physics, 2007, pp. 193–198.

19. W. B. Abdelkader, R. Bahloul, and H. Arfa, “Numerical investigation of the influence of some parameters in SPIF process on the forming forces and thickness distributions of a bimetallic sheet CP-titanium/low-carbon steel compared to an individual layer,” Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 47, pp. 1319–1327, 2020.

20. G. Ambrogio, L. Filice, and F. Micari, “A force measuring based strategy for failure prevention in incremental forming,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 177, nos. 1–3, pp. 413–416, 2006.

21. G. Hussain et al., “Tool and lubrication for negative incremental forming of a commercially pure titanium sheet,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 203, nos. 1–3, pp. 193–201, 2008.

22. M.-A. Malahias et al., “Complete wear-through of a metal-backed acetabular cup in an ambulatory patient,” Arthroplasty Today, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 394–400, 2019.

23. Aherwar, A. K. Singh, and A. Patnaik, “Current and future biocompatibility aspects of biomaterials for hip prosthesis,” AIMS Bioengineering, vol. 3, no. 1, 2015.

24. M. Ham and J. Jeswiet, “Single point incremental forming and the forming criteria for AA3003,” CIRP Annals, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 241–244, 2006.

25. Alruhban, Contribution à l'analyse de la déformabilité de renforts tricotés, Lille 1, 2013.

26. Z. Cheng et al., “Incremental sheet forming towards biomedical implants: A review,” Journal of Materials Research and Technology, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 7225–7251, 2020.

27. Nasulea and G. Oancea, “Incremental deformation: A literature review,” in MATEC Web of Conferences, EDP Sciences, 2017, p. 03017.

28. T. J. Grimm and L. Mears, “Investigation of a radial toolpath in single point incremental forming,” Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 48, pp. 215–222, 2020.

29. L. B. Said, J. Mars, M. Wali, and F. Dammak, “Effects of the tool path strategies on incremental sheet metal forming process,” Mechanics & Industry, vol. 17, no. 4, p. 411, 2016.

30. Kumar, V. Gulati, P. Kumar, and H. Singh, “Forming force in incremental sheet forming: a comparative analysis of the state of the art,” Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, vol. 41, pp. 1–45, 2019.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-01

How to Cite

[1]
“Numerical Impact of Tool Geometry on Hip Prosthesis Forming”, JME, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 122–135, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.37255/jme.v20i3pp122-135.