Multi-Objective Electric Discharge Machining Process ParametersOptimization of Inconel 718 by using Full Factorial Design of Experiments.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37255/jme.v20i2pp057-060Keywords:
Inconel 718, EDM, MRR, Ra, Machine Learning predictive model, full factorial, pulse on and off, peak current.Abstract
This study investigates the optimization of Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM) parameters for Inconel 718 using a copper electrode, focusing on improving material removal rate (MRR) and minimizing surface roughness (Ra). A full factorial design of experiments (DOE) was employed with three key input parameters: pulse on time, pulse off time, and peak current. Regression models and machine learning algorithms were applied to predict response outcomes, with statistical validation through ANOVA and multi-objective optimization using desirability functions. The optimal parameters achieved an MRR of 54.12 mm³/min and Ra of 3.38 µm. The findings demonstrate the effectiveness of full factorial design of the exprements in enhancing EDM performance, supporting its adoption for precision machining of nickel-based superalloys.
Downloads
References
1. Alam, N., Siddiquee, A. N., Fan, P., and Khan, N. M., “A comprehensive review on wire EDM performance evaluation,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering, vol. 236, no. 4, pp. 1724–1746, 2022, doi: 10.1177/09544089221074843.
2. Aggarwal, V., Singh, J., Sharma, S., Garg, H., Sharma, A., Singh, G., and Parshad, J., “An experimental study of wire breakage frequency on different electrodes during WEDM of Inconel-722,” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 954, no. 1, p. 012013, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/954/1/012013.
3. Klocke, F., Welling, D. R., Klink, A., Veselovac, D., Nöthe, T., and Perez, R., “Evaluation of Advanced Wire-EDM Capabilities for the Manufacture of Fir Tree Slots in Inconel 718,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 14, pp. 430–435, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2014.03.039.
4. Alias, A., Abdullah, B., and Abbas, N. M., “Influence of Machine Feed Rate in WEDM of Titanium Ti-6Al-4V with Constant Current (6A) Using Brass Wire,” Procedia Engineering, vol. 41, pp. 1806–1811, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.387.
5. Aggogeri, F., Pellegrini, N., and Tagliani, F. L., “Recent Advances on Machine Learning Applications in Machining Processes,” Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 18, p. 8764, 2021, doi: 10.3390/app11188764..
6. Datta, S., and Mahapatra, S. S., “Modeling, simulation and parametric optimization of wire EDM process using response surface methodology coupled with grey-Taguchi technique,” International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, vol. 2, no. 5, 2010, doi: 10.4314/ijest.v2i5.60144.
7. Ramakrishnan, R., and Karunamoorthy, L., “Multi response optimization of wire EDM operations using robust design of experiments,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 29, no. 1–2, pp. 105–112, 2005, doi: 10.1007/s00170-004-2496-.
8. Kanlayasiri, K., and Boonmung, S., “Effects of wire-EDM machining variables on surface roughness of newly developed DC 53 die steel: Design of experiments and regression model,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 192–193, pp. 459–464, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.04.085.
9. Sinha, S., and Chakradhar, D., “Prediction and analysis of process failures by ANN classification during wire-EDM of Inconel 718,” Advances in Manufacturing, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 519–536, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s40436-020-00327-w.
10. Srivastava, A. K., Yadav, S., and Singh, D. K., “Modeling and Optimization of Electric Discharge Machining Process Parameters in machining of Al 6061/SiCp Metal Matrix Composite,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 44, pp. 1169–1174, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.235.