EFFECT OF FIBER VOLUME FRACTION ON THE MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF COCONUT SHEATH/USP COMPOSITE

Authors

  • Siva I Centre for Composite Materials, Kalasalingam University, Krishnankoil, Tamilnadu- 626 126, India.
  • Winowlin Jappes J T Centre for Advanced Materials, CAPE Institute of Technology, Tirunelveli Tamilnadu-627114, India.
  • Sankar I Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Engineering College, Kovilpatti, Tamilnadu -628503, India.
  • Amico S C Department of Mechanical Engineering, UFRGS, Porto Alegre/RS, Brazil.
  • Ravindran D Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Engineering College, Kovilpatti, Tamilnadu -628503, India.

Keywords:

Coconut Sheath, Polyester Composite, Fiber Volume Fraction , Mechanical Test

Abstract

Natural fibers and their composites are the emerging trends in material science which are the replacements for the synthetic reinforcements. Because of their high specific strength and less processing requirements most of the plant based fibers are become center of research. This work used one of the novel reinforcements viz. “coconut sheath”. This reinforcement is directly drawn from the bottom portions of the coconut tree followed by minimum pre-processing before being used. Fiber volume fraction (FVF) is one of the most important factor when composite is in concern. The optimal level of reinforcement only can exhibit good bearing property. In this work, there four different fiber volumes were practiced in order to find the optimal fiber volume fraction. Density and hardness were taken as a measure for rheological properties, where flexural, ILSS and impact tests for mechanical properties. Result shows that, the trend in all the properties increased as a function of increase in fiber volume fraction except for impact strength.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Satyanarayana K, Pillai C, Sukumaran K, Pillai S, Rohatgi P and Vijayan K (1982), “Structure Property Studies of Fibres from Various Parts of the Coconut Tree”, Journal of Materials Science, Vol. 17, 2453–2462.

Roe P J and Ansel M P (1985), “Jute Reinforced Polymer Composites”, Journal of Materials Science, Vol. 20, 4015.

Joseph K, Thomas S and Pavithran C (1996), “Effect of Chemical Treatment on the Tensile Properties of Short Sisal Fibre-Reinforced Polyethylene Composites”, Polymer, Vol. 37, 5139.

Hornsby P R, Hinrichsen E and Tarvedi K (1997), “Preparation and Properties of Polypropylene Composites Reinforced with Wheat and Flax Straw Fibers”, Journal of Materials Science, Vol. 32, 1009.

Ghavami K, Toledo Filho R D and Barbosa N P (1999), “Behaviour of Composite Soil Reinforced with Natural Fibres”, Cem. Con. Comp, Vol. 21, 39.

Martin A R, Manolache S, Denes F and Mattoso L H C (2000), “Functionalization of Sisal Fibers and High-Density Polyethylene by Cold Plasma Treatment”, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Vol. 167, 739.

Neto F Levy, Balthazar J C and Pereira C T, “3rd International Symposium on Natural Polymer Composite- ISNAPOL-2000”, Sao Pedro, 376.

Raja M V, Pavan V, Saravanan A R, Dinesh Y J Rao, Shylaja Srihari and Revathi A (2001), “Hygrothermal Effects on Painted and Unpainted Glass/Epoxy Composites- Part A: Moisture Absorption Characteristics”, Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, Vol. 20, 1036-1047.

Sreekala M S et al (2002), “The Mechanical Performance of Hybrid Phenol-Formalde-Based Composites Reiforced with Glass and Oil Palm Fibers”, Composite Science Technology, Vol. 62, 239–253.

Moe M T, Liao K (2003), “Durability of Bamboo–Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer Matrix Hybrid Composites”, Composite Science Technology, Vol. 63, 375–387.

Tong J, Arnell R D, Ren L Q, Pothana L A, Oommenb Z and Thomas S (2003), “Dynamic Mechanical Analysis of Banana Fiber Reinforced Polyester Composites”, Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 63, 283.

Espert A, Vilaplana F and Karlsson S (2004), “Comparison of Water Absorption in Natural Cellulosic Fibres from Wood and One-year Crops in Polypropylene Composites and its Influence on their Mechanical Properties”, Composites Part A, Vol. 35, 1267–1276.

Jacoba M, Thomasa S and Varugheseb K T (2004), “Mechanical Properties of Sisal/Oil Palm Hybrid Fiber Reinforced Natural Rubber Composites”, Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 64, 955.

Agnelli, Kuruvilla Joseph, Laura H de Carvalho and Luiz H C Mattoso (2005), “Mechanical Properties of Phenolic Composites Reinforced with Jute/Cotton Hybrid Fabrics”, Polymer Composites, Vol. 26, 1-11.

Navin C and Deepak J (2005), “Effect of Sisal Fibre Orientation on Electrical Properties of Sisal Fibre Reinforced Epoxy Composite”, Composites Part-A, Vol. 36, 594.

Aquino E M F, Sarmento L P S, Oliveira W and Silva R V (2007), “Moisture Effect on Degradation of Jute/Glass Hybrid Composites”, “Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites”, Vol. 26, 219-233.

Umesh K, Dwivedi, Ajoy Ghosh, and Navin Chand (2007), “Abrasive Wear Behaviour of Bamboo (Dendrocalamus Strictus) Powder Filled Polyester Composites”, Bio-Resources, Vol. 2, 693.

Pothan L A, Thomas S and George J (1999), Tensile and Impact Properties of Banana Fiber/Glass Fiber Hybrid Polyester Composites, 12th International Conference on Composite Materials, Paris, France, 1267.

Mishra S, Mohanty A K and Drzal L T et al (2003), “Studies on Mechanical Performance of Bio-Fiber/Glass Reinforced Polyester Hybrid Composites”, Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 63, 1377–1385.

Velmurugan R and Manikandan V (2005), “Mechanical Properties of Glass/Palmyra Fiber Waste Sandwich Composites, Indian Journal of Engineering & Materials Sciences, Vol. 12, 563–570.

Padma Priya S and Rai S K (2006), “Mechanical Performance of Bio-Fiber/Glass-Reinforced Epoxy Hybrid Composites”, Journal of Industrial Textiles, Vol. 35, 217–226.

Downloads

Published

2013-03-01

How to Cite

[1]
Siva I, Winowlin Jappes J T, Sankar I, Amico S C, and Ravindran D, “EFFECT OF FIBER VOLUME FRACTION ON THE MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF COCONUT SHEATH/USP COMPOSITE”, JME, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 060–063, Mar. 2013.

Issue

Section

Articles