EFFECT OF FLUSHING CONDITIONS ON MATERIAL REMOVAL RATE IN EDM

Authors

  • Navdeep Malhotra School of Mechanical Engineering, Shri Mata Vaishno Devi University, Kakrial, Jammu-182320, India.
  • Hari Singh Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra-136119, Haryana, India

Keywords:

Electric Discharge Machining (EDM), Material Removal Rate, Ton, Duty Cycle, Flushing Condition

Abstract

This paper is focused on the comparative study of process control variables on Material removal rate under side and centre flushing conditions in EDM. In this research, one variable at a time methodology is adopted to investigate the effect of six control variables namely current,  voltage, spark gap, Ton,  duty cycle, and flushing pressure,  on material removal rate (MRR) in Electrical Discharge machining (EDM). The experiments were conducted on round copper tools of EN 31 with kerosene as dielectric under center flushing & side flushing conditions. The results indicate that machining parameters and flushing conditions have significant effects on Material Removal Rate (MRR).  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Zarepour H, Tehrani A F, Karimi D and Amini S (2007), “Statistical Analysis on Electrode Wear in EDM of Tool Steel DIN 1.2714 used in Forging Dies”, Journal of Material Processing Technology, Vol. 187-188, 711-714.

Mandal D, Pal S K and Saha P (2007), “Modeling of Electrical Discharge Machining Process using Back Propagation Neural Network and Multi-Objective Optimization using Non Dominating Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II”, Journal of Material Processing Technology, Vol. 186, 154-162.

Shu K M and Tu G C (2003), “Study of Electric Discharge Grinding using Metal Matrix Composite Electrode”, International Journal of Machine Tool Manufacturing, Vol. 43, 845-854.

Yan B H, Tsai H C and Huang F Y (2005), “The Effect of EDM of Dielectric of a Urea Solution in Water on Modified Surface of Titanium”, International Journal of Machine Tool Manufacturing, Vol. 45(2), 194-200.

Ho K H and Newman S T (2003), “State of Art Electric Discharge Machining (EDM)”, International Journal of Machine Tool Manufacturing, Vol. 43, 1287-1300.

McGeough J A (1988), “Advanced Methods of Machining”, Chapman and Hall, New York .

Josko V and Junkar M (2004), “On-Line Selection of Rough Machining Parameters”, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 149, 256-262.

Wang K (2003), “A Hybrid Intelligent Method for Modeling the EDM Process”, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacturing, Vol. 43, 995-999.

Wang P J and Tsai K M (2001), “Semi-Empirical Model on Work Removal and tool Wear in Electrical Discharge Machining”, Journal of Material Processing Technology, Vol. 114(1), 1-17.

Marafona J (2007), “Black Layer Characterization and Electrical Discharge Machining”, Journal of Material Processing Technology, Vol. 184, 27-31.

Luis C J, Puertas I and Villa G (2005), “Material Removal Rate and Electrode Wear Study on EDM of Silicon Carbide”, Journal of Material Processing Technology, Vol. 164-165, 889-896.

Chen S L, Yan B H and Huang F Y (1999), “Influence of Kerosene and Distilled Water as Dielectrics on the Electric Discharge Machining Characteristics of Ti-6Al-4V”. Journal of Material Processing Technology, Vol. 87, 107–111.

Kalpakjian S and Schmid S R (2001), “Manufacturing Engineering and Technology”, 4th Edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.

Khan A A (2008), “Electrode Wear and Material Removal Rate during EDM of Aluminium and Mild Steel using Copper and Brass Electrodes”, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 39, (5-6), 482-487.

Downloads

Published

2009-12-01

How to Cite

[1]
“EFFECT OF FLUSHING CONDITIONS ON MATERIAL REMOVAL RATE IN EDM”, JME, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 245–249, Dec. 2009, Accessed: Dec. 23, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://smenec.org/index.php/1/article/view/572

Similar Articles

81-90 of 334

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.